Organic Food Debunker was Tobacco Institute Researcher in 1976

See on Scoop.it - Perspectives on Health

By Michael Collins A widely publicized study claiming that there is no demonstrated difference in nutritional value between organically and conventional…

A widely publicized study claiming that there is no demonstrated difference in nutritional value between organically and conventionally grown foods just appeared in the Annals of Internal Medicine. Broad mainstream media coverage produced headlines like Stanford Scientists Cast Doubt on Advantages of Organic Meat and Produce. The media failed to mention one point that may be of major interest.

The study relied on a statistical technique called meta-analysis. Over 200 plus scientific journal articles were combined as the data set for the study. The article co-author with recognized expertise in meta-analysis, Ingram Olkin, applied for a grant from Council of Tobacco Research (CTR) in 1976.

See on foodfreedomgroup.com

via Tumblr Organic Food Debunker was Tobacco Institute Researcher in 1976